Identifying Stakeholders’ Roles in Implementation of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam
Keywords:
Stakeholder; Social network analysis; PFES; Implementation
Abstract
The policy of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) has been implemented in Vietnam since 2011 and in Hoa Binh province since 2013. Governmental agencies have conventionally implemented PFES at central, provincial, and district levels. However, there are shared responsibilities of the governmental organizations and other stakeholders at different levels in reality. Using social network analysis (SNA) indicators shows that the provincial Forest Forest Protection and Development Fund plays the most important role among involving stakeholders. Both density and centrality measurements have shown that the stakeholders in the PFES implementation network in Hoa Binh province have good coherence. Additionally, district-level governmental organizations and Viettel Telecom Company have shown their powerlessness in the policy implementation network.
References
[1]. Bao Han (2020). Implementation of payment for forest environmental services: Integration with livelihood development. Retrieved from https://daibieunhandan.vn/long-ghep-voi-phat-trien-sinh-ke-dimsh8olg6-50838, Dated 18th May 2021.
[2]. Bolland, J.M. (1988). Sorting out centrality: An analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks. Social Networks: 10(3): 233-253.
[3]. Borgatti S, Martin P, Linton C. (2002). UCINET 6.0 for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
[4]. Borgatti, S.P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks: 27(1):55-77.
[5]. Borgatti, S.P. and Everett, M.G., (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks: 21(1999): 375-395.
[6]. Burt, R.S., (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science: 566(1): 37-54. Doi: 10.1177/000271629956600104.
[7]. Butts C.T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 11(1):13–41.
[8]. Carrington P.J., Scott J., Wasserman S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 69-304.
[9]. Chepkoech, C. & Waiganjo, E.W. (2015) Role of stakeholders in the implementation of strategic change in commercial banks in Kenya: A case study of National Bank of Kenya Limited. International academic journal of human resource and business administration, 1 (5): 55-82.
[10]. Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks: 1(3): 215-239.
[11]. Freeman, R.E (1984). Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[12]. Freemand, R.E., & Mc Vea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. Working paper No. 01-02. The Darden School University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=263511 Dated 30th June 2021.
[13]. Gneiser M, Heidemann J, Landherr A, Klier M, Probst F. (2010). Valuation of online social networks taking into account users’ interconnectedness. Appears in: ISeBM Special Issue.
[14]. Hauck, J., Schmidt, J., Wener, A. (2016). Using social network analysis to identify key stakeholders in agricultural biodiversity governance and related land-use decisions at regional and local level. Ecology and Society: 21(2): 49.
[15]. Helbig, N., Dawes, S., Dzhusupova, Z., Klievink, B., and Mkude, C. (2015). “Stakeholder engagement in policy development: Observations and lessons from international experience”, in in Janssen, M., Wimmer, M., and Deljoo, A. (eds). Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research. Springer: pp.177.204.
[16]. Hutahaean, Marlan (2017). The Importance of Stakeholders Approach in Public Policy Making. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Volume 84: 462-466.
[17]. Mai Quyen, Vu Thi Minh Ngoc. (2018). Results of PFES implementation in Vietnam in the period 2011-2016. Journal of Science and Technology of Forest. VNUF. 3(2018): 74-83.
[18]. Mulyaningrum, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, I Nengah Surati Jaya, Bramasto Nugroho (2013). Stakeholders Analysis of Policy-Making Process: The Case of Timber Legality Policy on Private Forest. JMHT Vol. XIX, (2): 156-162. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.19.2.156.
[19]. Oliver TR. (2006). The politics of public health policy. Annu Rev Public Health. 27: 195-233. Doi: 10.1146/annurec.publhealth.25.101802.123126.
[20]. Pham Thu Thuy, Dao Thi Linh Chi, Hoang Tuan Long, Nguyen Dinh Tien, Le Manh Thang, Nong Hong Hanh, Dang Thuy Nga (2018). Impacts of Payments for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) in Son La, Vietnam. Report No.188. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
[21]. Pham TT, Bennet K, Vu TP, Brunner J, Le ND and Nguyen DT. (2013). Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam: From policy to practice. Occasional Paper 93. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR
[22]. Rombach, Michaela Puck and Porter, Mason Alexander and Fowler, James H. and Mucha, Peter J., (2013). Core-Periphery Structure in Networks. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2002684 Dated 20 June 2021.
[23]. Scott J. (2000). Social network analysis. 2nd ed. London (UK): Sage Publications. p. 16-60.
[24]. Valente T.W, Palinkas L.A, Czaja S, Chu K.H, Brown C.H,. (2015.) Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0131712. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131712.
[25]. Varone, F., Ingold, K., and Fischer, M. (2019). “Policy Networks and the Roles of Public Administrations” in A. Ladner (eds.), Swiss Public Administration, Governance and Public Management., Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92381-9-20 Dated 14 June 2021.
[26]. Wasserman S, Faust K. (1994). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social science. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p.25-302.
[27]. Zachary, Wayne W. (1977). An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups. Journal of Anthropological Research, 33(4):452–473. http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~mnl/store/Zachary1977a.pdf.
[2]. Bolland, J.M. (1988). Sorting out centrality: An analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks. Social Networks: 10(3): 233-253.
[3]. Borgatti S, Martin P, Linton C. (2002). UCINET 6.0 for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
[4]. Borgatti, S.P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks: 27(1):55-77.
[5]. Borgatti, S.P. and Everett, M.G., (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks: 21(1999): 375-395.
[6]. Burt, R.S., (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science: 566(1): 37-54. Doi: 10.1177/000271629956600104.
[7]. Butts C.T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 11(1):13–41.
[8]. Carrington P.J., Scott J., Wasserman S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 69-304.
[9]. Chepkoech, C. & Waiganjo, E.W. (2015) Role of stakeholders in the implementation of strategic change in commercial banks in Kenya: A case study of National Bank of Kenya Limited. International academic journal of human resource and business administration, 1 (5): 55-82.
[10]. Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks: 1(3): 215-239.
[11]. Freeman, R.E (1984). Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[12]. Freemand, R.E., & Mc Vea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. Working paper No. 01-02. The Darden School University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=263511 Dated 30th June 2021.
[13]. Gneiser M, Heidemann J, Landherr A, Klier M, Probst F. (2010). Valuation of online social networks taking into account users’ interconnectedness. Appears in: ISeBM Special Issue.
[14]. Hauck, J., Schmidt, J., Wener, A. (2016). Using social network analysis to identify key stakeholders in agricultural biodiversity governance and related land-use decisions at regional and local level. Ecology and Society: 21(2): 49.
[15]. Helbig, N., Dawes, S., Dzhusupova, Z., Klievink, B., and Mkude, C. (2015). “Stakeholder engagement in policy development: Observations and lessons from international experience”, in in Janssen, M., Wimmer, M., and Deljoo, A. (eds). Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research. Springer: pp.177.204.
[16]. Hutahaean, Marlan (2017). The Importance of Stakeholders Approach in Public Policy Making. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Volume 84: 462-466.
[17]. Mai Quyen, Vu Thi Minh Ngoc. (2018). Results of PFES implementation in Vietnam in the period 2011-2016. Journal of Science and Technology of Forest. VNUF. 3(2018): 74-83.
[18]. Mulyaningrum, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, I Nengah Surati Jaya, Bramasto Nugroho (2013). Stakeholders Analysis of Policy-Making Process: The Case of Timber Legality Policy on Private Forest. JMHT Vol. XIX, (2): 156-162. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.19.2.156.
[19]. Oliver TR. (2006). The politics of public health policy. Annu Rev Public Health. 27: 195-233. Doi: 10.1146/annurec.publhealth.25.101802.123126.
[20]. Pham Thu Thuy, Dao Thi Linh Chi, Hoang Tuan Long, Nguyen Dinh Tien, Le Manh Thang, Nong Hong Hanh, Dang Thuy Nga (2018). Impacts of Payments for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) in Son La, Vietnam. Report No.188. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
[21]. Pham TT, Bennet K, Vu TP, Brunner J, Le ND and Nguyen DT. (2013). Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam: From policy to practice. Occasional Paper 93. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR
[22]. Rombach, Michaela Puck and Porter, Mason Alexander and Fowler, James H. and Mucha, Peter J., (2013). Core-Periphery Structure in Networks. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2002684 Dated 20 June 2021.
[23]. Scott J. (2000). Social network analysis. 2nd ed. London (UK): Sage Publications. p. 16-60.
[24]. Valente T.W, Palinkas L.A, Czaja S, Chu K.H, Brown C.H,. (2015.) Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0131712. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131712.
[25]. Varone, F., Ingold, K., and Fischer, M. (2019). “Policy Networks and the Roles of Public Administrations” in A. Ladner (eds.), Swiss Public Administration, Governance and Public Management., Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92381-9-20 Dated 14 June 2021.
[26]. Wasserman S, Faust K. (1994). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social science. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p.25-302.
[27]. Zachary, Wayne W. (1977). An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups. Journal of Anthropological Research, 33(4):452–473. http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~mnl/store/Zachary1977a.pdf.
Published
2021-11-17
How to Cite
Nguyen Phuong, L., & Mai, Q. (2021). Identifying Stakeholders’ Roles in Implementation of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 22(2), 113 - 127. https://doi.org/10.54609/reaser.v22i2.96
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2021 Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright ©2019 Pro Global Science Association
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from Pro Global Science Association, to whom all requests to produce copyright material should be directed, in writing.
