All proposed articles are submitted to peer review by two anonymous referees and subsequently screened by the editor-in-chief. Essays published or under consideration elsewhere shall not be accepted.

 Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement:

The Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research (REASER) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal which fully supports the principles of transparency and best practices in scholarly publishing of the Committee on Publication Ethics and follows the provisions of the Code of Conduct for Journal Editors and Publishers. The journal clearly provides information on its scope and goals, the full names and affiliations of the editors in conspicuous places and has its own copyright form to be filled by the authors on submission of the article.

While assuring the confidentiality of information pertaining to the manuscripts, REASER is committed to fostering high standards of quality of the authors’ works and has the following expectations from the authors:

  • Original articles, not submitted elsewhere
  • Authorship of the article
  • Acknowledgment of sources used in the article
  • Responsibility of the content of the article and any potential errors
  • Observing the special template of the review and submitting a grammatical-error-free article
  • Disclosure of potential conflict of interest

In case of double submission or plagiarism, proved due to the use of anti-plagiarism checker software, the article will be immediately retracted.

The reviewers are expected to keep the confidentiality of the articles under revision, to maintain the standards of objectivity, and make a decision within the indicated term.

The editorial board takes responsibility for objective and blind peer-reviewing and makes publication decisions for submitted manuscripts regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion or political values of the author(s). Any deviation from the above-stated rules will be submitted to the attention of the Editor-in-chief and the founding members for immediate resolution.


The views expressed in this review are primarily those of the respective authors. The editorial board of this review accepts no responsibility for any use made of the information contained in the published materials and shall not be liable for any indirect prejudice caused by the use of the information contained in any of the articles.