Value Orientations of Young Students (Ages 18–23) in Kazakhstan: Findings from an Urban University Sample

Zhanna Khamzina; Yermek Buribayev; Amina  Buribayeva

doi:10.54609/reaser.v30i2.778

Zhanna Khamzina Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0913-2002
Yermek Buribayev Zhetysu University named after I. Zhansugurov https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0433-596X
Amina Buribayeva Nazarbayev Intellectual School of Physics and Mathematics in Almaty https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9775-6877

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54609/reaser.v30i2.778

Keywords: youth value orientations; social transformations; traditional and modernization values; civic identity; social adaptation; youth policy.

Abstract

We analyze value orientations among urban university students (ages 18–23) in Kazakhstan using a cross‑sectional survey (n = 600) and 20 semi‑structured interviews conducted face‑to‑face on university premises in Almaty and Astana (Oct–Nov 2024). The questionnaire adapts WVS‑7 items via double translation and piloting; interviews were transcribed and thematically coded. Scope is limited to students in two cities. Results. At the individual level, students prioritize self‑enhancement: 64% name financial stability as a key goal and 81% emphasize career advancement; leisure/time autonomy is important to 83%. Health is widely valued (65% monitor it, though 33% report no systematic approach). At the social level, family remains central (e.g., 97% prioritize relatives’ health/safety; 96% intra‑family relations; 95% family prosperity; 91% intergenerational ties), while wider non‑family circles are thinner. Institutionally, ideals of transparency/fairness are endorsed, but confidence is cautious: 25% trust those in power; 29.8% report trusting no public sources at all. Civically, respondents support lawful avenues (authorized rallies) and community responsibility, yet engagement is selective (34% express interest in socio‑political life; 29% report volunteering). Environmental concern is affirmed in principle, but salience is uneven: 23.4% do not believe climate change is real. Contribution. The value profile blends enduring family‑centered norms with pragmatic individualism and critical‑loyal views of institutions. Findings inform higher‑education policy and student support (civic‑engagement infrastructure, career transition and financial‑literacy services, environmental literacy), rather than nationwide youth policy. Limitations include urban student focus and cross‑sectional design; we outline longitudinal and comparative extensions.

References

Adilova, E., Aimaganbetova, O., Kassymova, L., Sadvakassova, Z., Ryskulova, M., & Sagna-yeva, T. (2021). Value Orientations of Modern Kazakhstanis of the Post-Soviet Period in the Context of Gender and Age Factors. The Open Psychology Journal, 14(1), 150–162. DOI: 10.2174/1874350102114010150.
Beissenova, A., Shormanbayeva, D., & Sundetbayev, D. (2014). Transformation Of System Of Values In The Kazakhstan Society (Based On The Results Of Sociological Research). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 168-171.
Beylur, S. (2020). The Nazarbayev generation: youth in Kazakhstan. Eurasian Research Jour-nal, 2(1), 119-122.
Burkhanov, A., Bigozhin, U., Blum, D., Hanks, R. R., Insebayeva, S., Isaacs, R., ... & Zhussip-bek, G. (2019). The Nazarbayev Generation: Youth in Kazakhstan. Rowman & Littlefield.
Castells, M. (2020). A new society. In The new social theory reader (pp. 315-324). Routledge.
Chapman, H., & Zhandayeva, R. (2023). Attitudes toward Russia’s War on Ukraine in Kazakh-stan and Kyrgyzstan. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 867. December 2023.
Davie, G. (1990). Believing without belonging: is this the future of religion in Britain?. Social compass, 37(4), 455-469. DOI: 10.1177/003776890037004004.
Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157.
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., ... & Pura-nen, B. (2022). World values survey: Round seven-country-pooled datafile version 5.0. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat, 747.
Ileuova, G. (2023). Kazakhstanis Become More Religious. CABAR.asia (Analytical article, 6 June 2023). Retrieved from https://cabar.asia.
Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215-228.
Inglehart, R. (2018). The trend toward postmaterialist values continues. In Citizen politics in post-industrial societies (pp. 57-66). Routledge.
Institut. (2021). Social modernization in Kazakhstan: opportunities and prospects. Collection of materials of the international conference. Almaty: Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Reli-gious Studies, Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Ka-zakhstan, 240.
Junisbai, B., & Junisbai, A. (2020). Are youth different? The Nazarbayev generation and public opinion in Kazakhstan. Problems of Post-Communism, 67(3), 251-263.
Junisbai, B., Junisbai, A., & Whitsel, C. (2017). What Makes “Ardent Democrats” in Kazakh-stan and Kyrgyzstan? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 489. Retrieved from George Washington University, October 2017.
Kazakhstan. (2015). Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated February 9, 2015 No. 285-V ZRK “On State Youth Policy”. URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31661446&show_di=1
Kazakhstan. (2020). Values of Kazakhstani society in a sociological dimension. Almaty, TОО «DELUXE Printery», 143. URL: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/kasachstan/18527.pdf
Kazakhstan. (2024). “Youth of Kazakhstan.” Youth Scientific Research Center. Astana, 104. URL: https://eljastary.kz/upload/iblock/ed3/ctmiz0x2er4nq1v0w01uug7wtb7jeahh.pdf
Kenzhebayeva, D. K., Urmurzina, B. G., & Mahammadli, D. (2018). The modern youth values in Kazakhstan. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of social and human sciences, 6(322), 51-66.
Khassenova, A. (2020). Agents of Change? Civic Engagement of Western-Educated Youth in Kazakhstan. Central Asian Survey, 39(2), 234–252. DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2019.1702001.
Kudaibergenova, D. T., & Laruelle, M. (2022). Making sense of the January 2022 protests in Kazakhstan: failing legitimacy, culture of protests, and elite readjustments. Post-Soviet Affairs, 38(6), 441–459. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2022.2077060.
Laruelle, M. (2019). Nazarbayev Generation: Overview of Kazakhstani Youth and National Identity Transformations. In: M. Laruelle (Ed.), The Nazarbayev Generation: Youth in Kazakhstan, pp. 1–22. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 1-22.
Ostiguy, P., Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., & Espejo, P. (2017). A socio-cultural approach. The Oxford handbook of populism, 73-97.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago press.
Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehen-sive guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Rennie, D. L. (2012). Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychological methods, 17(3), 385.
Schwartz, S. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative sociology, 5(2-3), 137-182.
Seidumanov, S. T., & Nurmuratov, S. E. (2022). Research on culture and societal values in the context of Kazakhstan’s sustainable development strategy: A collective monograph. Almaty: Institute of Philosophy, Political Science, and Religious Studies, Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 397.
Sharipova, D. (2020). Perceptions of national identity in Kazakhstan: Pride, language, and reli-gion. The Muslim World, 110(1), 89-106.
Sharipova, D., & Beimenbetov, S. (2021). Youth in Kazakhstan: Assessing Their Values, Expec-tations, and Aspirations. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Kazakhstan. ISBN: 978-601-06-7329-8.
Sheryazdanova, G., Nurtazina, R., Byulegenova, B., Serikzhanova, A., & Dzhunusova, A. (2024). Socioeconomic and political causes of youth radicalization during the January 2022 events in Kazakhstan. Global Perspectives, 5(1).
Thacher, D., & Rein, M. (2004). Managing value conflict in public policy. Governance, 17(4), 457-486.
Thorez, J. (2022, February 10). Kazakhstan: A breach of the social contract and the end of a po-litical cycle. Equal Times. URL: https://www.equaltimes.org/kazakhstan-a-breach-of-the-social
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2015). Interpretation and method: Empirical research meth-ods and the interpretive turn. Routledge.
Zharkynbekova, S., Shakhputova, Z., Galiyeva, B., & Absadyk, A. (2025). Value Priorities of Student Youth in the Multi-Ethnic Space of Kazakhstan and Their Influence on Intercultural Communi-cations. Journal of Media, 6(1), 32. DOI: 10.3390/journalmedia6010032.
Zhelnina, A. (2020). The apathy syndrome: How we are trained not to care about politics. Social Problems, 67(2), 358-378.
Zhussipbek, G., & Nagayeva, Z. (2019). Reception of Liberal Values and Globalization among Kazakhstani Youth. In: M. Laruelle (Ed.), The Nazarbayev Generation: Youth in Kazakhstan, pp. 161–177. Lanham: Lexington Books.